Monday, October 28, 2013

Marty McFly’s Life-changing Wardrobe

                                            
Marty McFly is a well-dressed man. It’s a sentiment that you will not hear me dispute — other than the fact that he’s not actually a man. Marty McFly is my dog. Marty came into my life about three years ago. I adopted Marty from a local Rescue group in Toledo. I must divulge that I grew up with Newfoundland dogs and English mastiffs. So a small 18-pound senior citizen chihuahua-terrier mix was kind of a “big” change for me. Sure my family has had a beagle and dachshunds in the smaller-framed category before, but none of these heartier fellows had the problems Marty seems to have. The other guys have had lots of bulk and muscle mass and tons of fur which my new twig-legged, short-coated friend does not.

Marty McFly gets cold. He gets cold easily. I figured out that his little internal thermostat is set at 72 degrees Fahrenheit. If the external temperature is anything over 73 degrees, he is panting. Anything under 71 degrees and he is shivering and gives me sad puppy-dog eyes pleading for warmth.

I must admit that before my time with Marty I knew that people dressed their dogs but I always wrote it off as kind of a silly thing to do. My past experiences with giant breed dogs led me to believe it was a frivolous practice to dress your pet. I still remember the day when I experienced the first real bout of shivering from Marty as the weather got colder. It was a late autumn day and only wrapping him in blankets would stop it — I realized I had a decision to make. Do I dare become one of those dog-dressing people? Do I cross that line? I decided I might as well try it out. If it made Marty’s life easier I would do it. I would sacrifice my dignity. I brought home a red plaid fleece jacket from a doggie boutique. He wore it around well, didn’t try and shake it off, or fight it as some dogs do. Miraculously, the shivering and pleading puppy-dog eyes stopped.

During my first year out of vet school I had a client who was an elderly lady that owned an elderly 7-pound toy poodle. Her complaint was that her dog was having “seizures.” She would have fits of shivering and chattering teeth that lasted several minutes at a time. What she described could have been considered a type of seizure. We discussed the varying symptoms of seizure disorders and our medical options. She was an older poodle due for annual wellness testing anyway, and to be thorough, we ran an organ profile. As we were discussing her poodle’s history and symptoms I asked her if she kept her heat low in the house. She reportedly kept her house warm (or so she thought). I suggested before starting her dog on seizure medications as she was asking, that we try a week of doggie-sweater wearing. She took home the prescribed sweater. The blood work came back normal. As I called to check in on the pooch a week later, the fits had stopped. I had unwittingly converted another person to the lifestyle of being a dog dresser.

Older dogs, puppies and sick pets can have trouble regulating their body temperatures. Puppies especially routinely need warming in blankets and will cuddle with each other in “dog piles” with their litter mates. If you have a young or small breed puppy you must offer them a warm place as hypothermia is a life-threatening concern and is avoidable. You don’t necessarily need to dress them in puppy sweaters, but rather, be vigilant of their environmental temperature.

Extreme weather conditions are a major concern for dogs that spend significant time outdoors. Even my beloved blocky-headed mastiffs will sometimes require small horse blankets in frigid climates. Outdoor dogs need easily accessible shelters with warm bedding to keep them safe from the elements. Frostbite and hypothermia are considerable risks with any dog living outdoors.

Since that cold autumn day when I first experienced Marty’s shivering escapades, his wardrobe has filled out. He doesn’t have as impressive a clothing line as some that I know, but he has a significant collection nonetheless. I have accepted the fact that I am now a dog dresser. I no longer make excuses for it. At Halloween, Marty McFly makes the cutest pterodactyl this side of the ice ages. So please be sympathetic and don’t shake your head in disgust at the next dog you see dressed in a bedazzled denim jacket or a Santa sweater — it may be a result of a veterinary prescribed wardrobe.


Author: Dr. Marisa L. Tong

Friday, October 25, 2013

October is National Pet Wellness Month!



Did you know? Have you heard?  October is National Pet Wellness Month!

When our babies are born, they immediately have their first wellness exam.  We continue to schedule and attend these exams as recommended and never miss an appointment.  Often pet owners begin puppy and kitten wellness exams nearly as early in life, but as the pet ages, these same owners tend to schedule visits less frequently than recommended.  

Please remember that every year of human life corresponds to approximately seven years for your dog, depending upon its size and breed.  As a result, if one year of wellness testing is missed for your dog, it is comparable to missing seven years of human checkups! Cats, too, age at a much more rapid rate than humans.  For example, a three year old cat is approximately 42 years old in human years. 

There are many reasons (or excuses) to not schedule your pet’s wellness visit…bad economy, lack of time, or the cost just does not fit into the budget at this time.  It is wise to keep in mind though, that wellness testing may find those otherwise undetected conditions that will end up costing you more in the long run.

Starting wellness testing when your pet is young gives you and your veterinarian a set of laboratory values that are normal or “baseline” for your pet.  Annual exams with blood testing can detect any abnormalities and provide the opportunity to treat any conditions early and more effectively. This will keep your pet healthier plus save substantial costs. Pet owners that are vigilant in providing necessary preventive treatments will find their pets healthier and happier.

When your pet reaches “senior” age level, yearly blood tests are even more important. It is at this stage that many organs begin to function at less than optimal levels, particularly the kidneys and liver.  Blood tests can detect these changes as well as others, and the necessary treatment can be determined to extend both the life and the quality of life of your pet.

So, let’s celebrate National Pet Wellness Month with our pets!  Give them the best care – the care that they deserve – and keep them healthy throughout every life stage!

Friday, October 18, 2013

                                                       
                           Don’t Rock the Boat (Parts 1 & 2)
          

 
                        “That’s my test!” I exclaimed to the GenAlysis receptionist. “Not really, but six years and a month ago I did make the first call to Dr. Beever to see about developing it.” 

                        A proud moment for me, I could barely contain my excitement. I had just received a fax from the genetics lab, and in a little box to the right of my scrapie results were the words “Ectodermal dysplasia [ Hairy lamb syndrome ].”

                        Although I knew the commercial availability of the test was imminent, this was my first proof it was actually real, and the effort begun those six years ago truly worthwhile.

                        I was never going to mention my hairy lambs in one of these columns again. To be honest, some bitterness on my part played a role in that decision. But one night I made a discovery that put a lot of things in perspective, and I felt compelled to tell this story. I guess you could say “it was in my genes.”    

                        While looking for an old photograph in a hutch by our kitchen, I found a far greater treasure- the Spring / Summer 1982 edition of The Speculum, a newsmagazine published by Ohio State’s College of Veterinary Medicine. Inside was an article about a retiring professor and the book he wanted to write, “Don’t Rock the Boat”, a memoir on “the foibles and political intrigue of university life.”

                        Included was advice he often gave his students: “The price you pay for nonconformity is non-acceptance. But go ahead if you can stand the non-acceptance- that’s how things get done.”

                         Last November, my five year stint as a member of the board of directors of the American Southdown Breeders Association came to an end. Minutes from the board meeting state that I didn’t seek re-election. One reason for that is because I was never elected to begin with. The true reason, though, is that I wasn’t intrigued by the politics anymore, just tired of it. 

                        In May 2007, I was appointed by the association president to chair a committee to find a solution to a problem that had been plaguing our breed for over twenty years- hairy lambs. These lambs are born not with wool but a short, silky, curly hair-coat, have a fine bone structure, and a jaw deformity resulting in a “parrot-mouth”.  

                        My first hairy lamb was born in the spring of 2006, and presented a “What the heck is that?” scenario. Was the poor little creature caused by a viral infection, a toxic plant or some kind of vitamin / mineral deficiency? When the second was born a year later, a familial link surfaced. The third and fourth born two weeks after that were nails in the genetic coffin.

                         My first act as chairman was to contact Dr. Jonathan Beever, a molecular geneticist at the University of Illinois, and one of the best livestock geneticists in the world. Perhaps it was his professorial aura, but something about him reminded me of my dad, and I sensed that he, too, might be a bit of a boat-rocker.

                        Immediately we set about to collect blood samples from hairy lambs, their parents and siblings, and study pedigrees to look for common ties. In November of that year I was asked to fill a board seat vacated by a retiring member. 

                        It didn’t take me long to realize that on a board full of sheep sellers I was probably one of the few, if not the only one, who represented buyers. And the really big sellers didn’t want anything or anybody to disrupt that process. 

                        Soon I began to hear this phrase: “We can’t be pointing fingers at anyone.”  I didn’t have to. The sheep with their ear-tags and registration papers did all the pointing necessary, and without exception, every hairy lamb I was privy to, and their associated pedigrees, pointed in the same direction. 
 
                        Hairy lambs had been reported from Texas to Minnesota and Massachusetts to California, and they all traced to a single flock located in the center of our nation. Apparently, sweeping bad recessive genes under the rug doesn’t make them go away; it just spreads them farther and wider. 

                        When I joined the sixteen member board, I became the thirteenth to have the problem in my flock; I simply didn’t know the status of the other three. Yet during the first two years of sample collecting, besides the president and me, only one other board member provided any samples. I found that profoundly disappointing. 

                        To be fair, I guess they were trying to protect their flocks. Unfortunately, not enough of them recognized I was trying to do the same- for theirs as well as my own.   

                                                                                                            …to be continued
                   
                                                        Don’t Rock the Boat, Part II
                         
                        By the summer of 2008, Dr. Beever began to employ new technology called single nucleotide polymorphism or SNP testing. I can’t even pretend to understand how it works, but it was supposed to be a faster method to uncover and identify genetic disorders using glass slides called “chips,” already mapped out genomes, and computers. Our hairy lamb problem was to be one of the first sheep conditions to utilize this tool.
 
                        That November, our vice-president, who happened to be the son of the owner of the suspected source flock, became president, and I was promptly relieved of my command and replaced by one of his friends. Needless to say, I was pretty much kept out of the hairy lamb loop after that, officially at least.
 
                        But breeders still called me about possible cases, and late one night, another board member expressed concern that someone might try to “derail the project.”
 
                        The next morning I called Dr. Beever and asked him this simple question: “Is there anything anyone can do or say to you to make you stop working on this?”
 
                        Dr. Beever, who can “go on and on and on” when talking about molecular genetics, in normal conversation is usually quite succinct. “No!”  was his reply.
 
                        A few lines of conversation later, though, he did add in reference to me, “You don’t have many friends.”
 
                        “Do I have you?”  I asked somewhat sheepishly.
 
                        “You bet. Absolutely.”
 
                        He had been through this kind of political stuff before with virtually every breed of every species he dealt with. If I could only have one friend, he was the one to have.
 
                         Still, my critics may have been justified. I probably was a tad overzealous in my approach. But the motive for that was clear to me, if not to anyone else. Real people were spending and losing real money on these sheep, and if our breed was going to continue to prosper, this problem had to be solved and solved quickly. 
 
                         I vividly recall a conversation I had with a grandfather from Illinois. His grandson had purchased a ram and a ewe for a fair amount of money, bred them, fed them over winter, and ended up with worthless hairy lambs the next spring.
 
                        Sympathizing with his frustration, I told him, “I know how you feel. I’ve had eleven of them.”
 
                        “Eleven! What did you do with the ewes?” he inquired.
 
                        “I got rid of most of them, but I kept two or three.”
 
                        When he asked “Why?” I hesitated a moment, then told the truth. “Because their mothers cost $3000.”
 
                        “Oh my God! Wait till I tell my grandson. That’ll make him feel a lot better!”
 
                        Yes, these were expensive sheep. Carriers of this defective gene included sale toppers, show champions, even National Show champions. My intent from the beginning, my reason for wanting to develop a test, was not to destroy these genetics or the flocks they came from, it was to save them, and move forward with non-carrier offspring to strengthen and improve the breed.
 
                        Over the next couple of years, however, there were setbacks with the new technology. The SNP chips used contained only a portion of the sheep genome, and Dr. Beever was not able to isolate our specific gene defect on them. The really bad news was that it might be two to three years before a more complete chip would be available.
 
                        So imagine my surprise on December 21, 2011, when I received an e-mail from him that read: “Do you want to test your entire flock with a new DNA-based test for hairy lamb?” Did I? You bet. Absolutely!
 
                        I’m not sure exactly what he did, but he somehow compared our original samples to blood from a non-Southdown flock and narrowed down the suspicious gene location, I think the old-fashioned way.
 
                        Over the next six months several hundred Southdowns were tested and although I can’t recall the precise numbers, I do remember that 18% were deemed carriers, which ironically is what I had in my flock [ 26/141 ] and I knew I had a problem!
 
                        To their credit, at the 2012 annual meeting the board voted that as of September 1, 2013, all Southdown sheep consigned to national level sales will have to be ectodermal dysplasia free, and as of January 1, 2014, all sheep entered in national level shows will have to be free as well.
 
                        Never again will Southdown enthusiasts have to suffer the emotional and financial disappointment of hairy lambs.
 
                        Don’t rock the boat? No. If the boat needs rocked, then rock the hell out of it. That’s how things get done. Thank you, Dad. And thank you Dr. Beever.
 
Author: Dr. John Jones

Tuesday, October 8, 2013

Don't Rock the Boat, Part 1


                                                Don’t Rock the Boat, Part I.

 

                        “That’s my test!” I exclaimed to the GenAlysis receptionist. “Not really, but six years and a month ago I did make the first call to Dr. Beever to see about developing it.”

                        A proud moment for me, I could barely contain my excitement. I had just received a fax from the genetics lab, and in a little box to the right of my scrapie results were the words “Ectodermal dysplasia [ Hairy lamb syndrome ].”

                         Although I knew the commercial availability of the test was imminent, this was my first proof it was actually real, and the effort begun those six years ago truly worthwhile.

                         I was never going to mention my hairy lambs in one of these columns again. To be honest, some bitterness on my part played a role in that decision. But one night I made a discovery that put a lot of things in perspective, and I felt compelled to tell this story. I guess you could say “it was in my genes.”    

                         While looking for an old photograph in a hutch by our kitchen, I found a far greater treasure- the Spring / Summer 1982 edition of The Speculum, a newsmagazine published by Ohio State’s College of Veterinary Medicine. Inside was an article about a retiring professor and the book he wanted to write, “Don’t Rock the Boat”, a memoir on “the foibles and political intrigue of university life.”

                        Included was advice he often gave his students: “The price you pay for nonconformity is non-acceptance. But go ahead if you can stand the non-acceptance- that’s how things get done.”

                        Last November, my five year stint as a member of the board of directors of the American Southdown Breeders Association came to an end. Minutes from the board meeting state that I didn’t seek re-election. One reason for that is because I was never elected to begin with. The true reason, though, is that I wasn’t intrigued by the politics anymore, just tired of it.

                         In May 2007, I was appointed by the association president to chair a committee to find a solution to a problem that had been plaguing our breed for over twenty years- hairy lambs. These lambs are born not with wool but a short, silky, curly hair-coat, have a fine bone structure, and a jaw deformity resulting in a “parrot-mouth”.

                        My first hairy lamb was born in the spring of 2006, and presented a “What the heck is that?” scenario. Was the poor little creature caused by a viral infection, a toxic plant or some kind of vitamin / mineral deficiency? When the second was born a year later, a familial link surfaced. The third and fourth born two weeks after that were nails in the genetic coffin.

                          My first act as chairman was to contact Dr. Jonathan Beever, a molecular geneticist at the University of Illinois, and one of the best livestock geneticists in the world. Perhaps it was his professorial aura, but something about him reminded me of my dad, and I sensed that he, too, might be a bit of a boat-rocker.

                        Immediately we set about to collect blood samples from hairy lambs, their parents and siblings, and study pedigrees to look for common ties. In November of that year I was asked to fill a board seat vacated by a retiring member.

                        It didn’t take me long to realize that on a board full of sheep sellers I was probably one of the few, if not the only one, who represented buyers. And the really big sellers didn’t want anything or anybody to disrupt that process.

                        Soon I began to hear this phrase: “We can’t be pointing fingers at anyone.”  I didn’t have to. The sheep with their ear-tags and registration papers did all the pointing necessary, and without exception, every hairy lamb I was privy to, and their associated pedigrees, pointed in the same direction.

                        Hairy lambs had been reported from Texas to Minnesota and Massachusetts to California, and they all traced to a single flock located in the center of our nation. Apparently, sweeping bad recessive genes under the rug doesn’t make them go away; it just spreads them farther and wider.

                        When I joined the sixteen member board, I became the thirteenth to have the problem in my flock; I simply didn’t know the status of the other three. Yet during the first two years of sample collecting, besides the president and me, only one other board member provided any samples. I found that profoundly disappointing.

                         To be fair, I guess they were trying to protect their flocks. Unfortunately, not enough of them recognized I was trying to do the same- for theirs as well as my own.  
 

                                                                                                            …to be continued
 
Author: Dr. John Jones